Table of Contents
Rome’s Anti-Migration Summit Exposes Europe’s Growing Disregard for Rights
The Controversial “Team Europe” Deal with Tunisia
The recent “Team Europe” deal with Tunisia’s autocratic leader, Kais Saied, has raised concerns about the European Union’s approach to curbing migrant arrivals. Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, a far-right leader, is now taking things a step further by inviting authoritarian rulers from across the Middle East and North Africa to a summit in Rome on July 23. This gathering, which will include European governments and representatives of international financial institutions, is expected to lay the groundwork for similar deals to the one struck with Tunisia.
Europe‘s Failure to Prioritize Human Rights
While the details of the conference are still unclear, it is evident that the deal with Tunisia, as praised by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, failed to prioritize human rights. Although the deal promises financial support and enhanced cooperation with Tunisia, it does not include any human rights conditions or address the serious abuses of Black African migrants by Tunisian authorities. This approach goes against what a human rights-based approach to migration and refugees should look like.
This situation is particularly troubling because it demonstrates that Europe has not learned from its complicity in the abuses of migrants in Libya. Furthermore, the intention to replicate the deal with other countries in the region, such as Egypt and Morocco, further highlights Europe‘s disregard for human rights.
Persistent Abuses by Egyptian and Moroccan Authorities
Egyptian and Moroccan authorities have been involved in serious abuses against migrants and asylum seekers. Egyptian authorities have introduced unlawful entry restrictions for those fleeing Sudan’s devastating conflict, unlawfully repatriated Eritrean asylum seekers, and failed to protect refugees who have suffered sexual assault.
Similarly, Moroccan authorities have committed serious abuses against migrants and asylum seekers and have been accused of using migrants as political bargaining chips. This has been evident in the encouragement of crossings into the Spanish enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla. In 2022, an attempted border crossing resulted in bloodshed for which accountability is still lacking.
Europe‘s failure to address these abuses not only perpetuates them but also emboldens repressive rulers who can boast about improved relations with European partners and claim credit for securing financial support for their failing economies.
An Abusive, Ill-Conceived, and Short-Sighted Strategy
Opposition to this abusive and ill-conceived strategy is necessary for European governments that value human rights and international law. The proposed deals with authoritarian regimes in the Middle East and North Africa have grave implications not only for the morality of Europe‘s migration policies but also for the continued suffering and deaths on Europe‘s doorstep.
This strategy not only fails to address the root causes of migration and refugee flows but also neglects the responsibility to protect the rights and well-being of asylum seekers and migrants. It is crucial for European governments and international organizations to prioritize human rights, establish clear conditions for cooperation, and hold these authoritarian regimes accountable for their actions.
Conclusion
Europe‘s growing disregard for human rights in its efforts to curb migration is a worrisome trend. The upcoming summit in Rome, which seeks closer cooperation with authoritarian regimes, only further highlights Europe‘s moral crisis. By disregarding the abuses perpetrated by these regimes and failing to include human rights conditions in their agreements, European governments risk perpetuating suffering and emboldening repressive rulers.
A shift is needed in European migration policies, one that prioritizes human rights and addresses the root causes of migration and refugee flows. It is crucial for European leaders to abandon this abusive and short-sighted strategy and instead focus on a comprehensive approach that upholds human rights, protects the vulnerable, and addresses the real challenges of migration and displacement.
<< photo by Barth Bailey >>
The image is for illustrative purposes only and does not depict the actual situation.
You might want to read !
- A Triumph for Environmental Rights: Amnesty International and Allies Awarded Coveted Human Rights Prize
- Hungary’s Controversial Bill: A Discriminatory Blow to Trans Women
- Defusing Disaster: Safely Transferring Oil from FSO SAFER to Avert Catastrophe
- Russia’s Aggression in Odesa Port: A Precursor to a Global Catastrophe
- Tunisia’s Treatment of Black African Migrants and Refugees: A Bleak Reality
- Amnesty International’s Involvement in Putin Arrest Warrant Case in South Africa
- The ICC Affirms Inquiry into Philippines’ Human Rights Violations
- Insights into the Philippines’ ICC Affirmation: An Assessment of the Prosecutor’s Inquiry
- Without resources, can there truly be rights?