Table of Contents
Amnesty International Launches Campaign Calling for Repeal of Lebanon‘s Insult and Defamation Laws
Background
In the midst of a potential constitutional crisis in Lebanon, Amnesty International has launched its #MyOpinionIsNotaCrime campaign. The organization is calling on the Lebanese Parliament to abolish all laws that criminalize insult and defamation. This move comes as Lebanon faces an increasing number of prosecutions targeting journalists, human rights defenders, activists, and individuals critical of state officials.
Since 2015, thousands of individuals have been targeted by criminal investigations for their criticism of political, security, judicial, and religious figures. In July, journalist Dima Sadek was sentenced to one year in prison and fined LBP 110 million (equivalent to around USD 1,200) on charges of criminal defamation and incitement for criticizing members of a political party on Twitter.
Amnesty International’s Deputy Director for the Middle East and North Africa, Aya Majzoub, describes Sadek’s case as a “travesty” and highlights how archaic criminal laws are being used to punish and silence dissent. This sentencing sends a chilling message to other journalists and stifles freedom of expression in the country.
The Impact of Insult and Defamation Laws
Lebanon‘s insult and defamation laws are designed to protect those in power from criticism. At a time when citizens should be freely discussing their expectations from leaders given the economic crisis and suffering, high-ranking officials are targeting journalists, human rights defenders, activists, and individuals attempting to expose corruption.
Amnesty International’s investigation reveals that high-level officials are increasingly weaponizing repressive criminal provisions to silence critics. The organization interviewed individuals who have been summoned for interrogation or are currently on trial over criminal defamation and insult complaints. Alarmingly, nine of the complaints were lodged by high-ranking officials.
Among the cases documented by Amnesty International, journalist Jean Kassir and editor-in-chief Lara Bitar were summoned for interrogation based on criminal defamation complaints filed by prominent officials after their work exposed alleged misconduct. These summonses are seen as intimidation attempts and political messages against the journalists.
Violation of Due Process
Amnesty International found that the officials who filed insult and defamation charges were using these laws as a means of retaliation, harassment, or intimidation. In all cases, the speech targeted by the charges is protected under international human rights law and is considered crucial for transparency and accountability in a society governed by the rule of law.
Furthermore, the security agencies handling these cases failed to follow standard procedures that protect the defendants’ due process rights. They engaged in intimidating behavior, such as threatening detention or pressuring the accused individuals to sign pledges to stop criticizing the complainants or remove allegedly defamatory content.
Reform and International Human Rights Standards
Lebanon‘s criminal insult and defamation provisions, found in the Penal Code, Publications Law, and Military Code of Justice, carry punishments of up to three years in prison. However, these laws are incompatible with international human rights standards.
Amnesty International is calling for the repeal of these provisions. The organization argues that criminal penalties are disproportionate punishments for reputational harm, and civil defamation and criminal incitement laws are sufficient to protect individuals’ reputations and maintain public order.
Aya Majzoub emphasizes that reform is needed to balance the protection of people’s reputations and the right to freedom of expression. Amnesty International’s #MyOpinionIsNotaCrime campaign urges the Lebanese authorities to repeal articles in the Penal Code, Publications Law, and Military Code of Justice that criminalize insults and replace defamation articles with new civil provisions that align with international human rights standards.
Editorial: Protecting Freedom of Expression in Lebanon
The Importance of Freedom of Expression
Freedom of expression is a fundamental human right that underpins a democratic society and allows for the exchange of ideas, criticism, and accountability. In Lebanon, where recent protests and economic hardships have sparked public discontent, protecting freedom of expression is more crucial than ever.
A Climate of Fear and Silence
The prosecutions and sentencing of journalists, human rights defenders, activists, and individuals critical of state officials instill fear and generate a climate of silence. They discourage open discussions on important issues, hinder the exposure of corruption, and hinder progress towards a more transparent and accountable society.
Political Manipulation and Retaliation
The misuse of insult and defamation laws in Lebanon points to a disturbing pattern of political manipulation and retaliation. High-ranking officials are weaponizing these archaic laws to shield themselves from criticism and suppress dissent. This abuse of power undermines democracy and weakens the trust between citizens and their leaders.
International Obligations and Reforms
Lebanon, as a member of the international community, is obligated to uphold human rights standards and ensure the protection of freedom of expression. The current insult and defamation laws not only violate these standards but also hinder the country’s progress towards a more democratic and inclusive society.
The call by Amnesty International to repeal these repressive provisions and replace them with new civil provisions aligns with international human rights norms. Lebanon must take immediate action to safeguard freedom of expression and protect the voices of journalists, human rights defenders, activists, and citizens who peacefully express their opinions.
Advice: Upholding Freedom of Expression in Lebanon
Legal Reforms
Lebanon should prioritize legal reforms to align its laws with international human rights standards. Repealing criminal insult and defamation provisions and replacing them with civil provisions would strike a balance between protecting reputations and ensuring freedom of expression.
Protection of Journalists and Activists
Lebanese authorities must ensure the protection of journalists, human rights defenders, activists, and individuals who peacefully express their opinions. This protection should extend to safeguarding their due process rights, preventing intimidation tactics, and dismissing unfounded complaints lodged by high-ranking officials.
International Support
The international community should support and reinforce Amnesty International’s #MyOpinionIsNotaCrime campaign. By raising awareness about the situation in Lebanon and exerting diplomatic pressure, foreign governments can encourage the Lebanese authorities to take meaningful actions to safeguard freedom of expression.
In conclusion, Lebanon‘s insult and defamation laws are being weaponized to punish and silence dissenters, stifling freedom of expression and hindering progress towards a more democratic and accountable society. Urgent legal reforms, protection for journalists and activists, and international support are necessary to uphold the fundamental right to express opinions freely without fear of criminal prosecution.
<< photo by Liza Summer >>
The image is for illustrative purposes only and does not depict the actual situation.
You might want to read !
- Why the IMF Should Play a Role in Expanding Nepal’s Child Grant Program
- Chaotic Social Security Reform in Sri Lanka: A Violation of People’s Rights
- South Sudan Joins Global Efforts in Banning Cluster Munitions
- Defending Papuan Forests: Standing with Indigenous Auyu in the Struggle for Environmental Justice
- The Crackdown Continues: Alexey Navalny Receives Harsh Sentence in Russia
- Ending the Cycle of Unlawful Force: A Call to Action in Bangladesh
- Paving the Way: Nepal’s Monumental Leap for Marriage Equality
- The Netherlands Takes a Bold Stand: Sex without Consent is Rape
- Egypt’s Electricity Crisis: A Threat to Basic Rights
- Unmasking Grave Police Abuses: Angola’s Brutal Crackdown on Activists
- Tanzania: Silencing Dissent – Arrests of Port Deal Critics Raise Concerns
- Cuba’s Continuing Injustice: Demanding the Release of Wrongfully Convicted Prisoners of Conscience
- Saudi Arabia Under Pressure to Respect Civil Society Vision
- The Urgent Call for Justice: Allegations of Forced Confession and Torture Surrounding the Imminent Execution of a Man in Vietnam