Table of Contents
Energy Activists Protest Against TotalEnergies’ LNG Floating Terminal in Le Havre Harbour
Introduction
Greenpeace France activists recently staged a protest against the arrival of TotalEnergies‘ Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) floating terminal, the FSRU Cape Ann, in Le Havre Harbour. The activists argue that the construction and operation of the LNG terminal contradicts France’s commitment to abandoning fossil fuels and has negative consequences for climate action and public health. This report delves into the motivations behind the protest, the impact of the LNG terminal, and offers insights into the broader debate around energy transition and the role of fossil fuels.
The Shock Doctrine and Energy Security
Greenpeace France accuses gas operators, including TotalEnergies, of employing a tactic known as the “shock doctrine.” They argue that these companies, under the guise of ensuring energy security during the war caused by the Russian invasion of Ukraine, have manipulated public messaging and lobbying efforts to expand fossil gas imports and infrastructure. By exploiting concerns over energy supply, gas operators have persuaded governments to invest in unnecessary and environmentally harmful projects. Greenpeace France characterizes TotalEnergies and its shareholders as the primary beneficiaries of the LNG terminal, prioritizing private interests and financial gain over climate action and public health.
The Role of US Shale Gas
Investigative reports by Greenpeace France reveal that the gas intended to supply the Le Havre LNG terminal primarily comes from US shale gas, which is in direct contradiction with France’s ban on fracking within its own territory due to its harmful impact on the climate and human health. Greenpeace activists argue that by importing shale gas, France is indirectly supporting and fueling the production of shale gas in the United States. This raises questions about the consistency of France’s commitment to abandon fossil fuels and the potential ethical implications of indirectly contributing to environmentally damaging practices abroad.
Questioning the Need for the LNG Terminal
According to Greenpeace France and Disclose, an independent investigative journalism organization, the usefulness of the LNG terminal in Le Havre for France’s energy sovereignty and that of its European neighbors is highly questionable. A recent investigation revealed that the terminal is unnecessary, even in the event of a cold winter, contrary to claims made by the French Ministry of Energy Transition. This finding suggests that the decision to construct the LNG terminal may have been influenced by the interests of facilities operators rather than actual energy demand.
Climate Action and Fossil Fuels
The ongoing global climate crisis underscores the urgency to transition away from fossil fuels. Activists argue that the installation of a new LNG terminal for a five-year period is not a sustainable option, particularly as additional fossil fuel infrastructure projects are being considered. Greenpeace calls on Europe to take swift action to drastically reduce fossil fuel consumption, invest in energy efficiency, and develop renewable energy sources. The protest in Le Havre is part of a larger global movement demanding an end to the era of fossil fuels.
Conclusion
The protest against TotalEnergies‘ LNG floating terminal in Le Havre Harbour highlights the tension between energy security, climate action, and public health. Greenpeace France activists argue that the construction and operation of the terminal prioritize private interests and financial gain over sustainable practices. The role of US shale gas in supplying the terminal raises questions about the consistency of France’s commitment to abandon fossil fuels. This protest underscores the need for policymakers to critically evaluate the impact and necessity of future energy infrastructure projects to ensure they are aligned with the goals of combating climate change and safeguarding public health.
Keywords:
Protest, Climate Activism, TotalEnergies, LNG Terminal, Le Havre Harbour, Environmental Protest, Fossil Fuels, Renewable Energy, Climate Change, Energy Transition
<< photo by Kelly >>
The image is for illustrative purposes only and does not depict the actual situation.
You might want to read !
- Climate activists stage bold protest against TotalEnergies’ LNG terminal in Le Havre harbour: A call for urgent action
- Climate Emergency in Pictures: A Year’s Worth of Photos that Define the Crisis.
- Climate Activists Stage Massive Protest at Europe’s Biggest Private Jet Event, Targeting Luxury Mega-Polluters
- Greenpeace Urges Global Stocktake Against Paris Climate Agreement Goals
- Unveiling the Dark Side: Greenpeace France’s Exposé on Fossil Fuel Greenwashing
- How TotalEnergies’ LNG Terminal Puts French Consumers, U.S. Communities, and Climate Goals at Risk
- Greenpeace protests against Fluxys LNG terminal’s lack of commitment to global climate goals
- Rallying for Change: Global Climate Protests Demand a Fossil Fuel-Free Future
- The Future of Turkey’s Energy Sector: Embracing Coal or Seeking Sustainable Solutions?
- The Urgent Plea: Southern European Presidents Unite to Phase Out Fossil Fuels
- Egypt’s Electricity Crisis: A Threat to Basic Rights
- Navigating the Stormy Seas: Unraveling the Future of the Global Ocean Treaty