Skip to content
May 30, 2025
Trending Tags
wordpress humanrights justice activism climatechange socialjustice democracy Crackdown

Rights To All

  • news
  • United Nations
  • health
  • Arms
  • Free Speech
  • Women’s Rights
  • Torture
  • support us

Breaking News

Burundi: Persistent Demands for Journalist’s Release, One Year Later

Exposing the Eco-Facades: Europe’s ‘Dirty Dozen’ Oil and Gas Giants Culpable of Greenwashing

Vietnam’s Bold Move to Release Anti-Corruption Campaigner from Jail

Education Under Siege: The Alarming Global Surge in Attacks on Learning Institutions

Cracking Down on Liberties: Algeria’s Alarming Assault on Fundamental Freedoms

The Climate Secrets of Energy Giant ENI: Unveiling a Surprising 70s Revelation

“International Action Needed: Kakhovka Dam Destruction Threatens Humanitarian Crisis in Ukraine”

How Nonprofit Hospitals Profit from Chasing Low-Income Patients into Debt

Reviving Africa: Breaking Free from Colonial Chains and Embracing a Sustainable Pan-African Future

Egypt’s Repression of Free Speech: The Urgent Call to Release Prominent Dissident on Trial

 
  • Home
  • 2023
  • October
  • 4
  • The EU’s Controversial Migration Agreement: A Risky and Excessive Approach
  • United Nations

The EU’s Controversial Migration Agreement: A Risky and Excessive Approach

On 2 years Ago
Patel Maya

Table of Contents

  • A Controversial Agreement: EU’s Risky and Excessive Approach to Migration
    • Introduction
    • The Rights of Asylum Seekers
    • Human Rights Side-lined in Negotiations
    • Evaluating the Agreement
    • Conclusion
  • You might want to read !

A Controversial Agreement: EU’s Risky and Excessive Approach to Migration

Introduction

In response to the recent news of EU leaders reaching an agreement on how to handle sudden increases in arrivals at Europe’s borders, as well as cases of so-called ‘instrumentalisation’ of migrants, Amnesty International has expressed deep concern regarding the potential consequences of this decision. The agreement would allow EU member states to deviate from the bloc’s usual asylum and reception standards, potentially leaving vulnerable individuals stranded, detained, or destitute along Europe’s borders. This move raises significant human rights concerns and threatens the protection of asylum seekers in the EU.

The Rights of Asylum Seekers

Amnesty International’s Director of the EU office, Eve Geddie, emphasizes the importance of upholding the rights of asylum seekers. People seeking refuge should be able to seek asylum, have their claims examined fairly, and be received with dignity. Denying them these fundamental rights is not only dangerous but also a disproportionate response to situations that could be handled under existing rules.

The proposed Crisis Regulation, if adopted, would enable EU member states to delay the registration of asylum seekers, use second-rate border asylum procedures on a larger scale, and expand border detentions. These measures have been associated with significant human rights abuses in Poland, Latvia, and Lithuania since 2021, as documented by Amnesty International. By normalizing the use of emergency provisions, the Crisis Regulation undermines the coherence of the common European asylum system while failing to effectively address future ‘crisis’ situations.

Human Rights Side-lined in Negotiations

Amnesty International raises concerns that the rush to reach an agreement on a broader package of EU asylum reforms should not sideline human rights. In negotiations that are expected to progress over the coming months, all EU institutions must guarantee the rights of asylum seekers. The protection of these rights should remain a priority, requiring careful consideration and thorough examination of any exceptional measures proposed.

The concept of ‘instrumentalisation’ of migrants, where third countries or non-state actors facilitate arrivals into the EU, cannot justify further derogations that undermine fundamental rights. Amnesty International calls on all EU institutions to refrain from additional exceptional measures in EU law that jeopardize the rights of individuals seeking asylum.

Evaluating the Agreement

The EU’s agreement on how to address sudden increases in arrivals at Europe’s borders and cases of ‘instrumentalisation’ of migrants raises troubling questions regarding its commitment to protecting human rights. By deviating from established asylum and reception standards, member states are taking a risky and excessive approach that ultimately undermines the very system they seek to uphold.

While acknowledging the challenges that EU member states face in managing migration, it is essential to find a balance that does not compromise the rights and well-being of vulnerable individuals. Upholding the principles of fairness, dignity, and access to asylum is crucial, regardless of the circumstances surrounding migration.

Conclusion

The recent agreement reached by EU leaders on handling sudden increases in arrivals at Europe’s borders and cases of ‘instrumentalisation’ of migrants raises serious human rights concerns. Amnesty International’s Director of the EU office, Eve Geddie, rightly highlights the risks associated with deviating from established asylum and reception standards. Protecting the rights of asylum seekers must always remain a priority, even in times of crisis.

As negotiations progress on the broader EU asylum reform package, it is crucial for EU institutions to ensure human rights are not side-lined. While challenges regarding migration management persist, striking a balance between security concerns and upholding the rights and dignity of asylum seekers is essential. A measured and proportionate approach that respects the principle of non-refoulement and guarantees fair and just treatment for those seeking refuge is necessary for Europe to maintain its standing as a beacon of human rights and compassion.

Migration-EUmigration,controversialagreement,riskyapproach,excessiveapproach


The EU
<< photo by Nirav Shah >>
The image is for illustrative purposes only and does not depict the actual situation.

You might want to read !

    In United NationsIn controversialagreement , EUmigration , excessiveapproach , riskyapproach

    Post navigation

    Raising Alarm: Escalating Clashes in Lebanon Imperil Education of Countless Children
    India’s Crackdown on Dissenting Media: Arrests and Raids at NewsClick Raise Concerns

    You May Like

    • United Nations
    Liu David
    On 2 years Ago

    The Continuing Injustice of the Rwanda Genocide: An Editorial Exploration

    • United Nations
    Liu David
    On 2 years Ago

    EU Lawmakers Demand Action on Rights Decline in Tunisia as Commission Remains Inactive

    • United Nations
    Lee Olivia
    On 2 years Ago

    “Urgent Appeal: Global Leaders Must Push for the Release of Ahmed Mansoor in Preparation for COP28”

    • United Nations
    Lee Olivia
    On 2 years Ago

    Rallying for Change: Global Climate Protests Demand a Fossil Fuel-Free Future

    • United Nations
    Lee Olivia
    On 2 years Ago

    The Republic of Rwanda: Unveiling the Disturbing Global Playbook of Suppression

    • United Nations
    Lee Olivia
    On 2 years Ago

    New York City: Striking the Balance Between Free Speech and Human Rights

    Rights To All @ Copyright All right reserved