Skip to content
October 10, 2025
Trending Tags
wordpress humanrights justice activism climatechange socialjustice democracy Crackdown

Rights To All

  • news
  • United Nations
  • health
  • Arms
  • Free Speech
  • Women’s Rights
  • Torture
  • support us

Breaking News

Centering Human Rights: Africa’s Leaders Urged to Take Ambitious Action at Key Climate Summit

Cameroon’s Separatist Violence: Demanding Justice for Unlawful Killings

Human Rights Watch’s Digital Innovations Recognized with Double Webby Win

Uncovering the Past: China’s Protest Movement.

Hyundai Construction Equipment Pledges to Halt Sales of Excavators Used for Illegal Gold Mining in the Amazon

“Urgency Needed: Addressing Sexual Abuse Claims by Indian Athletes at Olympics”

Holding Hostages: Hamas and Islamic Jihad Face Accusations of War Crimes

The Ripple Effect: Tracing The Journey Of Water From Source To Multi-Valued Resource

Greenpeace Urges Governments to Drastically Reduce Plastic Production by 75% by 2040

Cambodia’s Alarming Escalation of Violence against Dissidents and Their Families

 
  • Home
  • 2023
  • October
  • 4
  • The EU’s Controversial Migration Agreement: A Risky and Excessive Approach
  • United Nations

The EU’s Controversial Migration Agreement: A Risky and Excessive Approach

On 2 years Ago
Patel Maya

Table of Contents

  • A Controversial Agreement: EU’s Risky and Excessive Approach to Migration
    • Introduction
    • The Rights of Asylum Seekers
    • Human Rights Side-lined in Negotiations
    • Evaluating the Agreement
    • Conclusion
  • You might want to read !

A Controversial Agreement: EU’s Risky and Excessive Approach to Migration

Introduction

In response to the recent news of EU leaders reaching an agreement on how to handle sudden increases in arrivals at Europe’s borders, as well as cases of so-called ‘instrumentalisation’ of migrants, Amnesty International has expressed deep concern regarding the potential consequences of this decision. The agreement would allow EU member states to deviate from the bloc’s usual asylum and reception standards, potentially leaving vulnerable individuals stranded, detained, or destitute along Europe’s borders. This move raises significant human rights concerns and threatens the protection of asylum seekers in the EU.

The Rights of Asylum Seekers

Amnesty International’s Director of the EU office, Eve Geddie, emphasizes the importance of upholding the rights of asylum seekers. People seeking refuge should be able to seek asylum, have their claims examined fairly, and be received with dignity. Denying them these fundamental rights is not only dangerous but also a disproportionate response to situations that could be handled under existing rules.

The proposed Crisis Regulation, if adopted, would enable EU member states to delay the registration of asylum seekers, use second-rate border asylum procedures on a larger scale, and expand border detentions. These measures have been associated with significant human rights abuses in Poland, Latvia, and Lithuania since 2021, as documented by Amnesty International. By normalizing the use of emergency provisions, the Crisis Regulation undermines the coherence of the common European asylum system while failing to effectively address future ‘crisis’ situations.

Human Rights Side-lined in Negotiations

Amnesty International raises concerns that the rush to reach an agreement on a broader package of EU asylum reforms should not sideline human rights. In negotiations that are expected to progress over the coming months, all EU institutions must guarantee the rights of asylum seekers. The protection of these rights should remain a priority, requiring careful consideration and thorough examination of any exceptional measures proposed.

The concept of ‘instrumentalisation’ of migrants, where third countries or non-state actors facilitate arrivals into the EU, cannot justify further derogations that undermine fundamental rights. Amnesty International calls on all EU institutions to refrain from additional exceptional measures in EU law that jeopardize the rights of individuals seeking asylum.

Evaluating the Agreement

The EU’s agreement on how to address sudden increases in arrivals at Europe’s borders and cases of ‘instrumentalisation’ of migrants raises troubling questions regarding its commitment to protecting human rights. By deviating from established asylum and reception standards, member states are taking a risky and excessive approach that ultimately undermines the very system they seek to uphold.

While acknowledging the challenges that EU member states face in managing migration, it is essential to find a balance that does not compromise the rights and well-being of vulnerable individuals. Upholding the principles of fairness, dignity, and access to asylum is crucial, regardless of the circumstances surrounding migration.

Conclusion

The recent agreement reached by EU leaders on handling sudden increases in arrivals at Europe’s borders and cases of ‘instrumentalisation’ of migrants raises serious human rights concerns. Amnesty International’s Director of the EU office, Eve Geddie, rightly highlights the risks associated with deviating from established asylum and reception standards. Protecting the rights of asylum seekers must always remain a priority, even in times of crisis.

As negotiations progress on the broader EU asylum reform package, it is crucial for EU institutions to ensure human rights are not side-lined. While challenges regarding migration management persist, striking a balance between security concerns and upholding the rights and dignity of asylum seekers is essential. A measured and proportionate approach that respects the principle of non-refoulement and guarantees fair and just treatment for those seeking refuge is necessary for Europe to maintain its standing as a beacon of human rights and compassion.

Migration-EUmigration,controversialagreement,riskyapproach,excessiveapproach


The EU
<< photo by Nirav Shah >>
The image is for illustrative purposes only and does not depict the actual situation.

You might want to read !

    In United NationsIn controversialagreement , EUmigration , excessiveapproach , riskyapproach

    Post navigation

    Raising Alarm: Escalating Clashes in Lebanon Imperil Education of Countless Children
    India’s Crackdown on Dissenting Media: Arrests and Raids at NewsClick Raise Concerns

    You May Like

    • United Nations
    Lee Olivia
    On 2 years Ago

    Ireland’s Controversial Data Protection Law: Sacrificing Transparency for Security

    • United Nations
    Liu David
    On 2 years Ago

    Israel’s Blockade on Gaza: A Call for Urgent Humanitarian Intervention

    • United Nations
    Lee Olivia
    On 2 years Ago

    “New Treaty Calls for Global Support in Delivering Justice for Victims of Genocide and War Crimes”

    • United Nations
    Lee Olivia
    On 2 years Ago

    The Republic of Rwanda: Unveiling the Disturbing Global Playbook of Suppression

    • United Nations
    Samantha Chen
    On 2 years Ago

    Burkina Faso’s Army: A Dark Shadow of Unlawful Killings and Enforced Disappearances

    • United Nations
    Patel Maya
    On 2 years Ago

    Inadequate Justice: Life Sentence for Uyghur Scholar Highlights Worsening Rights Situation in China

    Rights To All @ Copyright All right reserved