Table of Contents
Report: Shocking Spyware Attacks Target Civil Society, Journalists, and Politicians
Amnesty International has conducted a major investigation revealing shocking spyware attacks against civil society, journalists, politicians, and academics in the European Union (EU), USA, and Asia. The investigation, known as the ‘Predator Files’ project, was carried out in partnership with the European Investigative Collaborations (EIC) and supported by Mediapart and Der Spiegel. The investigation uncovered the use of highly invasive spyware called Predator, developed and sold by the Intellexa alliance, which targeted at least 50 accounts belonging to 27 individuals and 23 institutions through social media platforms X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook between February and June 2023.
Powerful Surveillance Tools Used in Brazen Attacks
The Predator spyware, once infiltrated into a device, grants unfettered access to its microphone, camera, and all data without the user’s knowledge. Amnesty International Secretary General Agnes Callamard emphasizes that the victims of these attacks extend beyond the targeted individuals to include society as a whole, good governance, and human rights. Callamard further criticizes the Intellexa alliance, the developers of Predator and other surveillance products, for failing to limit the use of this spyware and disregarding its human rights implications.
Targets of Predator Spyware
The targets of the Predator spyware attacks included high-profile figures such as United Nations officials, Senators and Congressmen in the USA, Presidents of the European Parliament and Taiwan, and various academics and institutions. The investigation identified an attacker-controlled account on social media, ‘Joseph_Gordon16,’ which shared malicious links aiming to infect targets with Predator spyware. The account targeted individuals like Berlin-based journalist Khoa Lê Trung, editor-in-chief of thoibao.de, a news website blocked in Vietnam. Khoa had faced death threats over his reporting since 2018. The investigation suggests that the ‘Joseph_Gordon16’ account had links to Vietnam and may have been acting on behalf of Vietnamese authorities or interest groups.
Sales of Predator Spyware and Accountability
The investigation revealed evidence of a company within the Intellexa alliance signing a multi-million euro deal with Vietnam’s Ministry of Public Security for “infection solutions.” Google’s security researchers also confirmed the association of the Predator attack infrastructure with a government actor in Vietnam. Amnesty International calls on all EU member states and other countries where Intellexa alliance entities exist to revoke marketing and export licenses issued to the alliance. The states should also conduct independent investigations to determine the extent of unlawful targeting.
The Global Reach of Spyware and its Implications
The investigation found Intellexa alliance products in at least 25 countries across Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and Africa, and highlighted how they have been used to undermine human rights, press freedom, and social movements worldwide. The alliance, claiming to be an EU-based and regulated company, exposes the failure of EU member states and institutions to prevent the spread of surveillance products and protect individuals from their harmful effects. The Intellexa alliance must halt the production and sale of invasive spyware like Predator and provide compensation or other forms of redress to victims of unlawful surveillance.
Need for Tighter Regulation and Immediate Action
The Amnesty International report calls for a worldwide ban on highly invasive spyware and emphasizes the urgent need for stronger regulation and oversight of surveillance technologies. As the investigation reveals yet another scandal involving powerful surveillance tools, it is clear that current measures are insufficient to protect individuals and safeguard human rights. Governments must take immediate action to prevent the abuse of spyware and ensure that the technology is used only within a human rights-respecting regulatory framework.
<< photo by Anastasia Shuraeva >>
The image is for illustrative purposes only and does not depict the actual situation.
You might want to read !
- Revealing the Sinister Reach: ‘Predator Files’ Expose Brazen Spyware Targeting
- Greenpeace Survey Reveals Alarming Lack of Safety from Extreme Weather Events in Global South Cities
- Syria Torture Case: An Urgent Test for International Justice
- The Global Cybercrime Treaty: A Contentious Quest for Consensus
- Protecting Cyber Security in Bangladesh: Urgent Call to Remove Draconian Provisions in Draft Legislation
- Unveiling the Dark Side of Surveillance: The Catastrophic Failure to Regulate the Global Trade
- Mexico’s Ayotzinapa Case: Authorities’ Obstacles to Truth and Justice
- How Can We Safeguard Humanity in an Era of Killer Robots?
- The Future of Reproductive Rights in Brazil: Examining the Supreme Court’s Push for Abortion Decriminalization
- Detaining Relatives of Exiled Activists: Tajikistan’s Crackdown on Dissent
- Addressing the ‘Spy Clause’ in the UK’s Online Safety Bill: A Crucial Step Before Enactment
- New York City: Striking the Balance Between Free Speech and Human Rights