Turkey’s Convictions of Osman Kavala & Four Others: A Call for Urgent International Action

Human Rights Defender Osman Kavala Faces Unfair Trial

Introduction

The prosecution and conviction of human rights defender Osman Kavala and his co-defendants in connection with the Gezi Park protests of 2013 have been widely condemned as unfair and politically motivated. Numerous non-governmental organizations, including Amnesty International, have called for Kavala’s immediate release, stating that his trial is nothing more than a show trial designed to suppress dissent and stifle civil society activism in Türkiye. This report will examine the flaws in the trial, the violations of human rights, and the implications for Türkiye’s rule of law and international relations.

A Political Show Trial

From the beginning, the trial of Osman Kavala and his co-defendants has been marred by numerous irregularities and violations of due process. The Court of Cassation, Türkiye’s top appeals court, ignored the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, which found no basis for Kavala’s detention or trial and ordered his immediate release. This disregard for international legal obligations demonstrates how Türkiye’s justice system has become a tool of political repression.

The court’s verdict, which sentenced Kavala to life in prison without parole and his co-defendants to lengthy sentences, was based on flimsy evidence and failed to establish a causal link between their lawful activities and the alleged crimes. The court’s reliance on conspiracy theories and antisemitic tropes, particularly its allegations against the Open Society Foundation and George Soros, is deeply troubling and raises concerns about Türkiye’s commitment to human rights and freedom of expression.

Furthermore, the use of illegally obtained wiretapped conversations as admissible evidence further undermines the credibility of the trial. These conversations, instead of revealing any criminal activity, demonstrate that the defendants were engaged in lawful civil society activities and exercising their rights to free speech, association, and assembly.

Violations of Human Rights

The trial of Osman Kavala and his co-defendants represents a grave violation of their human rights. The prosecution and conviction of these individuals on false allegations of attempting to overthrow the government is a clear abuse of criminal law to target activists, human rights defenders, journalists, and others involved in civil society. This abuse of power undermines Türkiye’s commitment to respecting human rights and the rule of law.

Additionally, the rejection of parliamentary immunity for one of the defendants, Can Atalay, further highlights the erosion of democratic institutions in Türkiye. The Court of Cassation’s disregard for the Constitutional Court’s previous rulings on parliamentary immunity sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the separation of powers.

International Response

Türkiye’s European and international allies have a responsibility to address this injustice and hold Türkiye accountable for its human rights obligations. The European Court of Human Rights, the Council of Europe, the European Union, and the United Nations should treat this case as a priority human rights matter and push for the swift and full implementation of the European Court’s judgments, including the immediate release of the defendants.

It is crucial for Türkiye’s allies to firmly condemn the abuse of criminal law for political purposes and exert pressure on the Türkish government to respect human rights and uphold the rule of law. Robust efforts are needed to ensure that Türkiye adheres to its international human rights obligations and upholds the principle of an independent judiciary.

Conclusion

The trial of Osman Kavala and his co-defendants is a clear violation of their human rights and a troubling example of Türkiye’s shrinking space for civil society and political dissent. The justice system’s failure to adhere to international legal standards and its disregard for the European Court of Human Rights’ judgments raise serious concerns about Türkiye’s commitment to the rule of law.

Türkiye’s allies must not turn a blind eye to these violations. It is essential that they address this injustice as a matter of urgency, condemn the abuse of criminal law, and pressure the Türkish government to respect human rights and uphold the rule of law. The credibility and reputation of Türkiye’s judiciary and its international standing are at stake. Failure to act will only embolden Türkiye’s government to continue its crackdown on civil society and dissent, further eroding democracy and human rights in the country.

Justice-turkey,convictions,osmankavala,internationalaction