Table of Contents
South Korean Court Upholds Military ‘Sodomy’ Law
October 30, 2023
Introduction
In a disappointing setback for LGBTQ+ rights in South Korea, the Constitutional Court has upheld a provision in the country’s Military Criminal Act that prohibits same-sex activity between soldiers. This provision allows for punishments of up to two years in prison. This decision not only undermines the autonomy, dignity, and equality of LGBTQ+ soldiers but also perpetuates discrimination within the armed forces and in society at large.
A History of Discrimination
The Constitutional Court has previously considered challenges to this discriminatory provision four times since 2002, and in each instance, it has upheld the law. However, there was hope among advocates that the court would recognize the discriminatory nature of the provision, especially following a positive ruling last year by the Supreme Court. In that ruling, the Supreme Court overturned the convictions of two men who had been prosecuted under article 92-6 for engaging in consensual sex in a private setting while off duty. The Supreme Court acknowledged that the enforcement of the law undermined the autonomy, dignity, and equality of these individuals.
Impact on LGBTQ+ Soldiers
This decision to uphold the military ‘sodomy’ law is particularly concerning because South Korean men are required to perform military service, regardless of their sexual orientation, after they turn 18 years old. The preservation of this discriminatory provision sends a clear message that LGBTQ+ soldiers are considered a threat to military readiness, which is unjust and unfounded. This decision further marginalizes and stigmatizes LGBTQ+ individuals within the armed forces, impacting their mental well-being and overall sense of belonging.
Broader Implications for LGBTQ+ Rights in South Korea
This ruling is not only a setback for LGBTQ+ rights within the military but also for the broader LGBTQ+ community in South Korea. Discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals is still widespread in various contexts, including education. Attempts to support LGBTQ+ rights through parades, festivals, and other public means have often been met with interference by local officials, protests, and even violence. Despite polling suggesting broad support for LGBTQ+ inclusive nondiscrimination legislation, lawmakers have repeatedly failed to enact such laws, and efforts to recognize same-sex partnerships and families have been unsuccessful.
The Role of the National Assembly
The disappointing ruling by the Constitutional Court underscores the urgent need for action from the South Korean National Assembly. Lawmakers must prioritize repealing the archaic bans on same-sex activity and pass comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation. It is essential for South Korea to ensure basic equality for LGBTQ+ individuals and fulfill its obligations under international law.
Action Steps and Conclusion
In the interim, prosecutors should exercise discretion and drop prosecutions for consensual same-sex conduct within the military. Concrete steps should be taken to promote equal treatment and respect for the rights of LGBTQ+ soldiers. South Korea must embrace progress and create a society that values diversity and inclusivity.
It is crucial for civil society organizations, activists, and allies to continue advocating for LGBTQ+ rights in South Korea. Raising awareness, engaging in peaceful demonstrations, and supporting organizations that work towards protecting and advancing LGBTQ+ rights are vital in this ongoing struggle for equality.
Ultimately, South Korea’s progress as a nation must be measured not only by its strong economy and global influence but also by its commitment to protecting the rights and dignity of all its citizens, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity.
<< photo by Michelle Leman >>
The image is for illustrative purposes only and does not depict the actual situation.
You might want to read !
- South Korea’s Discriminatory Ruling against LGBTI Soldiers Sparks Concern for Human Rights
- South Korea’s Controversial ‘Anonymous Birthing’ Bill: Rethinking the Implications
- South Korea’s ‘Anonymous Birthing’ Bill: A Failure for Women and Children
- Bangladesh’s Ongoing Cycle of Protests: A Call to End Deaths, Arrests, and Repression
- Exploring Global Activism: Urban Movements Map Aims to Connect and Inspire on World Cities Day
- Crisis in the Middle East: Escalating Violence Threatens Innocent Lives
- Rising Incidents of Attacks on Students and Schools: Evaluating the Efficacy of the UN Resolution
- Ceasefire Urgency: A Call to End Unprecedented Civilian Suffering in Israel/OPT
- Mauritian Court Strikes Down Sodomy Law: A Landmark Ruling for Equality and Justice
- The Witch Hunt Must Cease: Over 70 Arrested in Nigeria for Attending a “Gay Party”
- Nigeria’s Lingering Justice: The Fate of #EndSARS Protesters in Lagos