Skip to content
June 25, 2025
Trending Tags
wordpress humanrights justice activism climatechange socialjustice democracy Crackdown

Rights To All

  • news
  • United Nations
  • health
  • Arms
  • Free Speech
  • Women’s Rights
  • Torture
  • support us

Breaking News

Jordan Faces Scrutiny Over Child Rights Record

Hyundai Construction Equipment Pledges to Halt Sales of Excavators Used for Illegal Gold Mining in the Amazon

The Ripple Effect: Tracing The Journey Of Water From Source To Multi-Valued Resource

Uganda’s Labor Rights: Upholding the Treaty to Ensure Workplace Protection

Youth from 100 countries demand climate justice at Climate Justice Camp: A call to action before COP28

The Persecution Continues: Aleksei Navalny Sentenced to 10+ Years in Penal Colony

States Must Empower and Protect Haitian Asylum Seekers: Putting an End to Racist Treatment

“Singapore’s Capital Punishment Crisis: Urgent Call to Halt Unlawful Executions”

The Complexities and Implications of the UAE’s Invitation to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad for COP28

Stop the revocation of rights for transgender and gender-diverse people in Pakistan

 
  • Home
  • 2023
  • October
  • 13
  • The Battle for Equality: Nepal Courts Deny Recognition of Same-Sex Marriages
  • Free Speech

The Battle for Equality: Nepal Courts Deny Recognition of Same-Sex Marriages

On 2 years Ago
Samantha Chen

Table of Contents

  • Nepal Courts Refuse to Register Same-Sex Marriages
    • Background
    • The Case of Maya Gurung and Surendra Pandey
    • Supreme Court‘s Attempts for Change
    • Undermining Nepal‘s Reputation as a Legal Leader
  • Philosophical Discussion
    • Equality and Rights
    • Changing Cultural Norms
    • The Role of the Judiciary
  • Editorial
  • Advice
    • 1. Legislative Action
    • 2. Coordination within the Judiciary
    • 3. Education and Awareness
  • You might want to read !

Nepal Courts Refuse to Register Same-Sex Marriages

Background

Two lower courts in Nepal have recently denied a couple the recognition of their marriage, defying the Supreme Court‘s recent interim order to register same-sex marriages while legislative change is pending. This raises concerns over the protection of LGBTQ+ rights and the adherence to constitutional protections for sexual and gender minorities in Nepal.

The Case of Maya Gurung and Surendra Pandey

The couple, Maya Gurung, a transgender woman legally recognized as male, and Surendra Pandey, a cisgender man, held a Hindu wedding ceremony in 2017. After the Supreme Court‘s order to register same-sex marriages, they attempted to register their marriage in June at the Kathmandu District Court, but their application was rejected. The court argued that it did not need to recognize a couple that did not consist of one legal male and one legal female. The couple then took their appeal to the Patan High Court, which also rejected their registration, stating that the national law must be changed first before such marriages can be recognized.

Supreme Court‘s Attempts for Change

The Supreme Court of Nepal has a globally-recognized track record of upholding the rights of LGBTQ+ people. In 2007, the court ordered the government to establish a committee to study same-sex marriage, and in 2015, the committee recommended legal recognition of same-sex marriage based on the principle of equality. However, successive governments have failed to bring legislation to parliament, leading to further court rulings. Earlier this year, the court ordered the government to recognize the marriage of a Nepali man who had married a German man.

Undermining Nepal‘s Reputation as a Legal Leader

The refusal of the lower courts to register same-sex marriages, despite the Supreme Court‘s ruling, undermines Nepal‘s reputation as a legal leader on sexual orientation, gender identity, and human rights. It also risks violating the constitutional protections for sexual and gender minorities in the country.

Philosophical Discussion

Equality and Rights

The case in Nepal raises important questions about equality and the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals. The concept of equality suggests that all individuals should be treated fairly and without discrimination. Denying same-sex couples the right to register their marriages contradicts this principle of equality and infringes upon the basic rights of LGBTQ+ individuals to be recognized and protected by the law.

Changing Cultural Norms

Cultural norms and attitudes towards same-sex marriages vary greatly across different societies. While some countries have made significant progress in recognizing and legalizing same-sex marriages, others continue to uphold traditional norms that limit marriage to heterosexual couples. In Nepal, the Supreme Court has taken steps towards recognizing same-sex marriages, but the resistance faced from lower courts highlights the ongoing cultural and societal challenges in accepting and embracing LGBTQ+ rights.

The Role of the Judiciary

The judiciary plays a crucial role in safeguarding the rights of all individuals and upholding the principles of justice and equality. In the case of Nepal, the Supreme Court has been at the forefront of advocating for LGBTQ+ rights. However, the resistance faced from lower courts raises concerns about the implementation and enforcement of these rights. It calls for a more cohesive and coordinated approach within the judiciary to ensure consistent protection and recognition of LGBTQ+ rights.

Editorial

The recent decision by two lower courts in Nepal to defy the Supreme Court‘s order and refuse the registration of same-sex marriages is not only a setback for LGBTQ+ rights but also a blow to Nepal‘s reputation as a legal leader on sexual orientation, gender identity, and human rights. The lower courts’ insistence on changing the national law before recognizing same-sex marriages goes against the spirit of equality upheld by the Supreme Court.

It is crucial for Nepal to maintain consistency and unity within its judicial system to fully protect and recognize the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals. The lower courts must adhere to the Supreme Court‘s decisions and implement them effectively and without delay. This will not only uphold the principles of justice and equality but also send a strong message to society that LGBTQ+ rights are fully respected and protected in Nepal.

Advice

To ensure the protection and recognition of LGBTQ+ rights in Nepal, it is essential for the following steps to be taken:

1. Legislative Action

The government must prioritize legislative action to bring about comprehensive legal reforms that recognize and protect the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals. This will require introducing bills in parliament that address same-sex marriage and other related issues. The laws should respect the principles of equality and non-discrimination.

2. Coordination within the Judiciary

There needs to be better coordination and communication among different levels of the judiciary to ensure consistency in the interpretation and implementation of the law. Lower courts should carefully consider the precedents and orders set by the Supreme Court and uphold them without hesitation.

3. Education and Awareness

Efforts should be made to promote education and awareness about LGBTQ+ issues across society. This will help challenge discriminatory attitudes and foster acceptance and understanding. Educational institutions, civil society organizations, and the media can play a vital role in driving such initiatives.

Nepal has made significant strides in recognizing LGBTQ+ rights through the actions of its Supreme Court. However, it is crucial that this progress translates into concrete and consistent change on the ground. The government, judiciary, and civil society must work together to ensure that all individuals, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity, are treated with dignity and respect under the law.

Swift clarity and equality will benefit the couples who want to register their marriages and contribute to the overall inclusion and progress of Nepal as a society.

Same-SexMarriage–wordpress,same-sexmarriage,equality,Nepal,court,recognition


The Battle for Equality: Nepal Courts Deny Recognition of Same-Sex Marriages
<< photo by Poul Cariov >>
The image is for illustrative purposes only and does not depict the actual situation.

You might want to read !

  • Russian Justice System Under Fire: The Urgent Need to Halt Arbitrary Prosecution of Aleksei Navalny’s Defense Team
  • Russian Human Rights Defender Convicted for “Discrediting” the Armed Forces: A Blow to Freedom of Expression and Civil Liberties
  • The Dehumanization of Immigrants: Examining the Extreme Anti-Immigrant Proposals in Texas
  • Nepal’s Legal Limitations on Same-Sex Marriages: A Setback for Equality
  • Estonia’s Historic Step: Same-Sex Marriage Legalized
  • Namibia Takes a Leap Towards Equality: Foreign Same-Sex Marriages Legally Recognized
  • The Power of Reliable and Efficient Public Transport: Showcasing Tokyo, Manila, and Tarragona
  • Greenpeace’s Urgent Plea: Governments Must Slash Plastic Production by 75% by 2040
  • The True Measure of Prosperity: Unraveling the Meaning of Growth
  • Exploiting the Vulnerable: The Dark Reality of Migrant Workers in Saudi Arabia
  • “The Fight for Justice: Tales of Activism Against Fluxys’ Harmful Gas Imports”
  • Türkiye: Osman Kavala’s Council of Europe Prize Reflects the Ongoing Fight for Justice
  • Op-Ed: It’s Time for NYC Mayor to Champion Human Rights and Reject Harmful Discourse
  • The Uphill Battle for Justice: France’s Conflicting Stances on Grave Crimes
In Free SpeechIn court , Equality , Nepal , Recognition , same-sexmarriage , wordpress

Post navigation

“The Fight for Justice: Tales of Activism Against Fluxys’ Harmful Gas Imports”
Greenpeace Calls on Antarctic Ocean Commission to Prioritize Ocean Protection

You May Like

  • Free Speech
Liu David
On 2 years Ago

Investigating the Challenges Faced by LGBTQ+ Individuals in Nigeria

  • Free Speech
Samantha Chen
On 2 years Ago

Nepal’s Landmark Decision: Same-Sex Spouses to be Recognized by Court

  • Free Speech
Liu David
On 2 years Ago

Another Blow to Human Rights in Lebanon: Attack on LGBTI Bar Raises Concerns

  • Free Speech
Lee Olivia
On 2 years Ago

Mauritian Court Strikes Down Sodomy Law: A Landmark Ruling for Equality and Justice

  • Free Speech
Lee Olivia
On 2 years Ago

South Korean Court Upholds Controversial Military ‘Sodomy’ Law: A Step Backward for LGBTQ+ Rights?

  • Free Speech
Lee Olivia
On 2 years Ago

The Climate Crisis and LGBTQIA2S+ Communities: Exploring Disproportionate Impacts

Rights To All @ Copyright All right reserved