Table of Contents
Texas Laws Threaten Houston Area Voting Rights
Introduction
In a concerning development, Texas laws that rewrite election rules in Harris County, including Houston, have created unnecessary barriers for voters and appear to disproportionately target the state’s largest Black population. These laws, signed by Governor Greg Abbott in June 2023, have raised concerns about their potential impact on voting rights and the fairness of elections.
The Targeting of Harris County
The two measures signed into law, Senate Bill 1750 and Senate Bill 1933, specifically apply to Harris County, the state’s most populous county and home to the second largest population of Black Americans in the United States. This targeted approach has raised alarm among human rights advocates who argue that these laws unfairly undermine the voices of Harris County residents.
Senate Bill 1750 eliminates Harris County’s nonpartisan election administrator position, while Senate Bill 1933 gives the secretary of state broad authority to intervene in the county’s elections. These changes, implemented right before an election, are seen as procedurally unfair and discriminatory, particularly against Black and Brown voters.
The Implications for Voting Rights
The laws are set to go into effect on September 1, just over a month before the voter registration deadline. If not overturned by the courts, the Harris County tax assessor and county clerk will administer future elections, including the upcoming Houston municipal election in November. However, these offices will have less than three months to prepare polling places, hire poll workers, and distribute crucial information to voters.
Human Rights Watch argues that accurate information about election procedures is essential for ensuring the human right to vote. The lack of clear information and late-notice changes imposed by these laws are likely to have a chilling effect on the right to vote, potentially leading to decreased voter turnout.
Election Reforms and Setbacks
It is important to note that Harris County had taken steps to enhance access to the ballot during the Covid-19 pandemic by increasing the number of polling places, implementing 24-hour and drive-through voting, and significantly increasing the county’s election budget. These reforms contributed to increased turnout among youth, first-time voters, and communities of color.
However, these positive reforms were later overturned by the Texas legislature in 2021. Texas is not alone in targeting election administration to advance partisan interests, as seen in North Carolina where legislators introduced a voter suppression bill that aimed to overturn state and county-level election boards.
Conclusion and Recommendations
The targeting of Harris County through the imposition of these new voting laws raises serious concerns about the fairness and equal representation in future elections. The potential impact on Black and Brown voters, as well as vulnerable communities, cannot be ignored.
It is crucial for lawmakers in a democratic society to prioritize policies that increase civic participation rather than undermine it. Voting rights organizations, advocacy groups, and concerned citizens should continue to carry out legal challenges, raise public awareness, and advocate for comprehensive voting rights legislation.
Efforts to protect and expand voting rights must include robust measures to overcome difficulties in voting, ensuring that every eligible citizen can exercise their constitutional right to vote without unnecessary barriers and discriminatory practices.
In addition, it is essential for the federal government to address the erosion of voting rights at the state level. Congress should pass comprehensive voting rights legislation, such as the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, to restore and strengthen voting protections for all Americans.
Protecting and expanding access to the ballot is a fundamental aspect of a democratic society, and every effort must be made to ensure that the voices of all citizens are heard and represented.
<< photo by Priscilla Du Preez >>
The image is for illustrative purposes only and does not depict the actual situation.