Skip to content
June 27, 2025
Trending Tags
wordpress humanrights justice activism climatechange socialjustice democracy Crackdown

Rights To All

  • news
  • United Nations
  • health
  • Arms
  • Free Speech
  • Women’s Rights
  • Torture
  • support us

Breaking News

Ending the Cycle of Unlawful Force: A Call to Action in Bangladesh

Russia’s Crackdown on Press Freedom: Arbitrary Detention of RFE/RL Editor Reveals Chilling Censorship Tactics

“Reconsidering the Consequences: Thailand’s Monarchy Charge Against Child Protester”

Greenpeace and Global Demonstrations: A Powerful Call to #EndFossilFuels

The Forced Repatriation Crisis: China’s Controversial Return of 500+ North Koreans

Decolonizing Africa’s Climate Agenda: Forging a Sustainable Pan-African Future

The Oversight of Fossil Fuels in the Plastic Treaty Negotiations

Mitigating the Humanitarian Crisis: Tunisia’s Response to Intercepting and Expelling African Migrants at Sea

“Amnesty International Reports: Senegal’s Ngor Faces Excessive Use of Force”

The World Court Sheds Light on Syria’s Torture Crisis

 
  • Home
  • 2023
  • October
  • 31
  • South Korean Court Upholds Controversial Military ‘Sodomy’ Law: A Step Backward for LGBTQ+ Rights?
  • Free Speech

South Korean Court Upholds Controversial Military ‘Sodomy’ Law: A Step Backward for LGBTQ+ Rights?

On 2 years Ago
Lee Olivia

Table of Contents

  • South Korean Court Upholds Military ‘Sodomy’ Law
    • Introduction
    • A History of Discrimination
      • Impact on LGBTQ+ Soldiers
      • Broader Implications for LGBTQ+ Rights in South Korea
    • The Role of the National Assembly
    • Action Steps and Conclusion
  • You might want to read !

South Korean Court Upholds Military ‘Sodomy’ Law

October 30, 2023

Introduction

In a disappointing setback for LGBTQ+ rights in South Korea, the Constitutional Court has upheld a provision in the country’s Military Criminal Act that prohibits same-sex activity between soldiers. This provision allows for punishments of up to two years in prison. This decision not only undermines the autonomy, dignity, and equality of LGBTQ+ soldiers but also perpetuates discrimination within the armed forces and in society at large.

A History of Discrimination

The Constitutional Court has previously considered challenges to this discriminatory provision four times since 2002, and in each instance, it has upheld the law. However, there was hope among advocates that the court would recognize the discriminatory nature of the provision, especially following a positive ruling last year by the Supreme Court. In that ruling, the Supreme Court overturned the convictions of two men who had been prosecuted under article 92-6 for engaging in consensual sex in a private setting while off duty. The Supreme Court acknowledged that the enforcement of the law undermined the autonomy, dignity, and equality of these individuals.

Impact on LGBTQ+ Soldiers

This decision to uphold the military ‘sodomy’ law is particularly concerning because South Korean men are required to perform military service, regardless of their sexual orientation, after they turn 18 years old. The preservation of this discriminatory provision sends a clear message that LGBTQ+ soldiers are considered a threat to military readiness, which is unjust and unfounded. This decision further marginalizes and stigmatizes LGBTQ+ individuals within the armed forces, impacting their mental well-being and overall sense of belonging.

Broader Implications for LGBTQ+ Rights in South Korea

This ruling is not only a setback for LGBTQ+ rights within the military but also for the broader LGBTQ+ community in South Korea. Discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals is still widespread in various contexts, including education. Attempts to support LGBTQ+ rights through parades, festivals, and other public means have often been met with interference by local officials, protests, and even violence. Despite polling suggesting broad support for LGBTQ+ inclusive nondiscrimination legislation, lawmakers have repeatedly failed to enact such laws, and efforts to recognize same-sex partnerships and families have been unsuccessful.

The Role of the National Assembly

The disappointing ruling by the Constitutional Court underscores the urgent need for action from the South Korean National Assembly. Lawmakers must prioritize repealing the archaic bans on same-sex activity and pass comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation. It is essential for South Korea to ensure basic equality for LGBTQ+ individuals and fulfill its obligations under international law.

Action Steps and Conclusion

In the interim, prosecutors should exercise discretion and drop prosecutions for consensual same-sex conduct within the military. Concrete steps should be taken to promote equal treatment and respect for the rights of LGBTQ+ soldiers. South Korea must embrace progress and create a society that values diversity and inclusivity.

It is crucial for civil society organizations, activists, and allies to continue advocating for LGBTQ+ rights in South Korea. Raising awareness, engaging in peaceful demonstrations, and supporting organizations that work towards protecting and advancing LGBTQ+ rights are vital in this ongoing struggle for equality.

Ultimately, South Korea’s progress as a nation must be measured not only by its strong economy and global influence but also by its commitment to protecting the rights and dignity of all its citizens, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity.

LGBTQ+rights-SouthKorea,Court,Military,SodomyLaw,LGBTQ+Rights


South Korean Court Upholds Controversial Military
<< photo by Michelle Leman >>
The image is for illustrative purposes only and does not depict the actual situation.

You might want to read !

  • South Korea’s Discriminatory Ruling against LGBTI Soldiers Sparks Concern for Human Rights
  • South Korea’s Controversial ‘Anonymous Birthing’ Bill: Rethinking the Implications
  • South Korea’s ‘Anonymous Birthing’ Bill: A Failure for Women and Children
  • Bangladesh’s Ongoing Cycle of Protests: A Call to End Deaths, Arrests, and Repression
  • Exploring Global Activism: Urban Movements Map Aims to Connect and Inspire on World Cities Day
  • Crisis in the Middle East: Escalating Violence Threatens Innocent Lives
  • Rising Incidents of Attacks on Students and Schools: Evaluating the Efficacy of the UN Resolution
  • Ceasefire Urgency: A Call to End Unprecedented Civilian Suffering in Israel/OPT
  • Mauritian Court Strikes Down Sodomy Law: A Landmark Ruling for Equality and Justice
  • The Witch Hunt Must Cease: Over 70 Arrested in Nigeria for Attending a “Gay Party”
  • Nigeria’s Lingering Justice: The Fate of #EndSARS Protesters in Lagos
In Free SpeechIn court , LGBTQ+rights , military , SodomyLaw , SouthKorea

Post navigation

Bangladesh’s Ongoing Cycle of Protests: A Call to End Deaths, Arrests, and Repression
The Unaccounted Failures: A Closer Look at Meta’s Role in the Tigray Conflict

You May Like

  • Free Speech
Samantha Chen
On 2 years Ago

Uganda’s Anti-LGBTI Bill Approval: A Dangerous Attack on Human Rights.

  • Free Speech
Patel Maya
On 2 years Ago

The Growing Threat of Online Incitement: Combating Hate Speech Against LGBT People in Cameroon

  • Free Speech
Patel Maya
On 2 years Ago

Nepal’s Legal Limitations on Same-Sex Marriages: A Setback for Equality

  • Free Speech
Samantha Chen
On 2 years Ago

“An Empowering Milestone: Japan’s Supreme Court Protects Transgender Rights in the Workplace”

  • Free Speech
Liu David
On 2 years Ago

US Courts Uphold Transgender Rights: A Blow to Anti-Trans Legislation

  • Free Speech
Lee Olivia
On 2 years Ago

The Climate Crisis and LGBTQIA2S+ Communities: Exploring Disproportionate Impacts

Rights To All @ Copyright All right reserved